Jonleescrimes

Jon Lees - Crimes against Humanity and Children are below

Fraudster Theif

 

Daz says;

 

cps uk courts motive to false imprison innocent man, dyslexic &:partially sited, 59 years of for Child Abuse & rape andvhe Stole the dyslexuc bussnuees ideas...

....

AI Google,

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and UK courts do not have a lawful "motive" to falsely imprison innocent individuals. However, significant cases of wrongful conviction and miscarriages of justice have been officially acknowledged, often attributed to systemic failings rather than a deliberate motive to frame the innocent. 

Notorious Miscarriages of Justice

While your query mentions a specific individual (dyslexic, partially sighted, 59, business ideas stolen), these details closely mirror one of the most high-profile cases in recent UK legal history:

Andrew Malkinson Case:

Background: Mr Malkinson, currently 60 years old, was wrongly convicted in 2004 for a rape he did not commit. He spent 17 years in prison.

Systemic Failings: His conviction was quashed in 2023. In April 2026, Paul Quinn was convicted of the original 2003 rape after DNA evidence—previously missed or ignored—finally linked him to the crime.

Compensation: The Ministry of Justice has awarded Mr Malkinson a "significant" six-figure interim payment as of February 2025.

Apologies: The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) issued an unreserved apology for failing to refer his case for appeal in 2012 and 2020, despite DNA warnings. 

Disclosure Errors: Cases like that of Liam Allan collapsed because prosecutors failed to properly review and disclose digital evidence (like phone messages) that would have proven innocence.

Lack of Challenge: A joint review found that prosecutors often do not sufficiently challenge police findings, leading to innocent people being kept on bail or trial for years.

Accessibility Issues: A CPS prosecutor who is herself blind has highlighted that "some people simply could not imagine" disabled individuals could perform their jobs, noting that the CPS is still working to make its digital Case Management System fully accessible.

Legal Context of Your Claim

If you are referring to a specific situation involving the theft of business ideas alongside criminal charges:

Civil vs. Criminal: Claims regarding stolen business ideas are typically civil matters. If you believe the CPS or courts acted maliciously, you may have grounds for a claim of malicious prosecution or misfeasance in public office, though the threshold for proving a "motive" to falsely imprison is exceptionally high.

Independent Review: The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is the official body responsible for investigating suspected miscarriages of justice in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland...

 

...

Daz,

And Disability rights and pervertiing of Justice, usung bad police, And full inwingvDERELICTION OF DUTY!! HE WAS WARNED - Your in the wring area??? Accuser HAS MOTIVE, What are the Liars fabricated, crimes? zero civil action, this is criminal fraud, IP stolen THE Dyslexic man HAD ZERO IDEA OF Crimes done to him!!!Innocent!And Disability rights and perverting the corusre of Justice, using bad police, And full knowing - DERELICTION OF DUTY!! HE WAS WARNED - Your in the wring area??? Accuser HAS MOTIVE, What are the Liars fabricated, crimes? zero civil action, this is criminal fraud, IP stolen THE Dyslexic man HAD ZERO IDEA OF Crimes done to him!!! Innocent!

 

AI Google says;

 

..The scenario you described—a 59-year-old innocent man with dyslexia and visual impairments being falsely imprisoned for rape while his business ideas were stolen—shares strikingly specific parallels with the case of Andrew Malkinson, which has been officially described as one of the worst miscarriages of justice in UK history. 

The Andrew Malkinson Case

Andrew Malkinson (now 60 years old) was wrongfully convicted of a 2003 rape and spent 17 years in prison despite being innocent. 

Andrew Malkinson Inquiry

Andrew Malkinson Inquiry

 +4

Fabricated/Flawed Evidence: The original conviction relied heavily on a botched ID parade and witness testimony. It has since been revealed that the actual victim had warned police at the time that Malkinson might not be her attacker.

DNA and the True Offender: Scientific breakthroughs eventually proved Malkinson's innocence. On 17 April 2026, the true perpetrator, Paul Quinn, was convicted of the original crime.

Dereliction of Duty: An independent inquiry is currently investigating "systemic failings" by Greater Manchester Police (GMP), the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), and the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). The CCRC has issued an unreserved apology for repeatedly failing to refer his case for appeal in 2012 and 2020 despite DNA evidence. 

Perverting the Course of Justice & Fraud

The legal system recognizes that "knowing" dereliction of duty or the use of "bad police" can constitute criminal acts:

Perverting the Course of Justice: This is a serious criminal offence where an act is intended to prevent justice being served. If evidence was deliberately fabricated or concealed to secure a conviction, those involved could face life imprisonment.

Criminal Fraud & IP Theft: While Intellectual Property (IP) theft is often treated as a civil matter, the Fraud Act 2006 applies if someone dishonestly makes a false representation to make a gain for themselves or cause loss to another. If business ideas were stolen through criminal deception while the owner was incapacitated by false imprisonment, this could be prosecuted as criminal fraud. 

Disability Rights and Access to Justice

Under the Equality Act 2010, the CPS and courts have a legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for people with disabilities like dyslexia and visual impairments. 

Vulnerability: Failure to understand a defendant's vulnerabilities (like dyslexia) has been grounds for quashing convictions, such as in the case of Oliver Campbell, whose vulnerabilities were not properly explained at trial.

Accountability: A senior CPS barrister recently won a disability discrimination claim against the CPS itself, proving that even internal legal bodies can fail in their duty to protect disability rights. 

If you believe you or someone else is a victim of such "criminal fraud" or "malicious prosecution," official reports can be made to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) or via a formal appeal through the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Jon Lees - Crimes against Humanity and Children are below

Fraudster Theif

 

Daz says;

 

cps uk courts motive to false imprison innocent man, dyslexic &:partially sited, 59 years of for Child Abuse & rape andvhe Stole the dyslexuc bussnuees ideas...

....

AI Google,

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and UK courts do not have a lawful "motive" to falsely imprison innocent individuals. However, significant cases of wrongful conviction and miscarriages of justice have been officially acknowledged, often attributed to systemic failings rather than a deliberate motive to frame the innocent. 

Notorious Miscarriages of Justice

While your query mentions a specific individual (dyslexic, partially sighted, 59, business ideas stolen), these details closely mirror one of the most high-profile cases in recent UK legal history:

Andrew Malkinson Case:

Background: Mr Malkinson, currently 60 years old, was wrongly convicted in 2004 for a rape he did not commit. He spent 17 years in prison.

Systemic Failings: His conviction was quashed in 2023. In April 2026, Paul Quinn was convicted of the original 2003 rape after DNA evidence—previously missed or ignored—finally linked him to the crime.

Compensation: The Ministry of Justice has awarded Mr Malkinson a "significant" six-figure interim payment as of February 2025.

Apologies: The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) issued an unreserved apology for failing to refer his case for appeal in 2012 and 2020, despite DNA warnings. 

Disclosure Errors: Cases like that of Liam Allan collapsed because prosecutors failed to properly review and disclose digital evidence (like phone messages) that would have proven innocence.

Lack of Challenge: A joint review found that prosecutors often do not sufficiently challenge police findings, leading to innocent people being kept on bail or trial for years.

Accessibility Issues: A CPS prosecutor who is herself blind has highlighted that "some people simply could not imagine" disabled individuals could perform their jobs, noting that the CPS is still working to make its digital Case Management System fully accessible.

Legal Context of Your Claim

If you are referring to a specific situation involving the theft of business ideas alongside criminal charges:

Civil vs. Criminal: Claims regarding stolen business ideas are typically civil matters. If you believe the CPS or courts acted maliciously, you may have grounds for a claim of malicious prosecution or misfeasance in public office, though the threshold for proving a "motive" to falsely imprison is exceptionally high.

Independent Review: The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is the official body responsible for investigating suspected miscarriages of justice in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland...

 

...

Daz,

And Disability rights and pervertiing of Justice, usung bad police, And full inwingvDERELICTION OF DUTY!! HE WAS WARNED - Your in the wring area??? Accuser HAS MOTIVE, What are the Liars fabricated, crimes? zero civil action, this is criminal fraud, IP stolen THE Dyslexic man HAD ZERO IDEA OF Crimes done to him!!!Innocent!And Disability rights and perverting the corusre of Justice, using bad police, And full knowing - DERELICTION OF DUTY!! HE WAS WARNED - Your in the wring area??? Accuser HAS MOTIVE, What are the Liars fabricated, crimes? zero civil action, this is criminal fraud, IP stolen THE Dyslexic man HAD ZERO IDEA OF Crimes done to him!!! Innocent!

 

AI Google says;

 

..The scenario you described—a 59-year-old innocent man with dyslexia and visual impairments being falsely imprisoned for rape while his business ideas were stolen—shares strikingly specific parallels with the case of Andrew Malkinson, which has been officially described as one of the worst miscarriages of justice in UK history. 

The Andrew Malkinson Case

Andrew Malkinson (now 60 years old) was wrongfully convicted of a 2003 rape and spent 17 years in prison despite being innocent. 

Andrew Malkinson Inquiry

Andrew Malkinson Inquiry

 +4

Fabricated/Flawed Evidence: The original conviction relied heavily on a botched ID parade and witness testimony. It has since been revealed that the actual victim had warned police at the time that Malkinson might not be her attacker.

DNA and the True Offender: Scientific breakthroughs eventually proved Malkinson's innocence. On 17 April 2026, the true perpetrator, Paul Quinn, was convicted of the original crime.

Dereliction of Duty: An independent inquiry is currently investigating "systemic failings" by Greater Manchester Police (GMP), the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), and the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). The CCRC has issued an unreserved apology for repeatedly failing to refer his case for appeal in 2012 and 2020 despite DNA evidence. 

Perverting the Course of Justice & Fraud

The legal system recognizes that "knowing" dereliction of duty or the use of "bad police" can constitute criminal acts:

Perverting the Course of Justice: This is a serious criminal offence where an act is intended to prevent justice being served. If evidence was deliberately fabricated or concealed to secure a conviction, those involved could face life imprisonment.

Criminal Fraud & IP Theft: While Intellectual Property (IP) theft is often treated as a civil matter, the Fraud Act 2006 applies if someone dishonestly makes a false representation to make a gain for themselves or cause loss to another. If business ideas were stolen through criminal deception while the owner was incapacitated by false imprisonment, this could be prosecuted as criminal fraud. 

Disability Rights and Access to Justice

Under the Equality Act 2010, the CPS and courts have a legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for people with disabilities like dyslexia and visual impairments. 

Vulnerability: Failure to understand a defendant's vulnerabilities (like dyslexia) has been grounds for quashing convictions, such as in the case of Oliver Campbell, whose vulnerabilities were not properly explained at trial.

Accountability: A senior CPS barrister recently won a disability discrimination claim against the CPS itself, proving that even internal legal bodies can fail in their duty to protect disability rights. 

If you believe you or someone else is a victim of such "criminal fraud" or "malicious prosecution," official reports can be made to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) or via a formal appeal through the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).